Skip to main content

Cooran vs Ningi

Property investment comparison - Cooran, QLD 4569 vs Ningi, QLD 4511

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cooran wins 0, Ningi wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCooranNingi
Median house price$995K$990K
Median unit price$700K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.57%3.67%
Gross rental yield (units)2.41%2.90%
1-year house growth+10.0%estimate+16.8%
3-year house growth-+45.6%
Vacancy rate3.3%0.5%
Population1,7565,349

Cooran vs Ningi: what the numbers say

The median house price is $995K in Cooran and $990K in Ningi, so Ningi is the cheaper entry point, with Cooran houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Ningi leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.67%, compared with 3.57% in Cooran, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.0% in Cooran (an estimate) and +16.8% in Ningi, so recent momentum favours Ningi, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Ningi and 3.3% in Cooran, so landlords in Ningi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ningi is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,349 against 1,756, roughly 3.0 times the size of Cooran; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ningi for rental income, Ningi for a lower purchase price, Ningi for recent price momentum, Ningi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison