Skip to main content

Cooroy vs Flaxton

Property investment comparison - Cooroy, QLD 4563 vs Flaxton, QLD 4560

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cooroy wins 4, Flaxton wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCooroyFlaxton
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$860K$915K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.48%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.24%3.66%
1-year house growth+13.4%estimate+13.0%
3-year house growth-+8.3%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.6%
Population4,801992

Cooroy vs Flaxton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Cooroy and $1.2M in Flaxton.

For units, Cooroy sits at a median of $860K against $915K in Flaxton, which makes Cooroy the more affordable unit market and Flaxton the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.4% in Cooroy (an estimate) and +13.0% in Flaxton, so recent momentum favours Cooroy, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Cooroy and 1.6% in Flaxton, so landlords in Cooroy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cooroy is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,801 against 992, roughly 4.8 times the size of Flaxton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cooroy for recent price momentum, Cooroy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Cooroy vs Flaxton: Property Investment Comparison (2026)