Skip to main content

Cooroy vs Oxenford

Property investment comparison - Cooroy, QLD 4563 vs Oxenford, QLD 4210

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cooroy wins 2, Oxenford wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCooroyOxenford
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$860K$770K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.48%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.24%4.67%
1-year house growth+13.4%estimate+14.4%
3-year house growth-+48.4%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.7%
Population4,80112,273

Cooroy vs Oxenford: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Cooroy and $1.2M in Oxenford, so Cooroy is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Cooroy sits at a median of $860K against $770K in Oxenford, which makes Oxenford the more affordable unit market and Cooroy the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.4% in Cooroy (an estimate) and +14.4% in Oxenford, so recent momentum favours Oxenford, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Cooroy and 1.7% in Oxenford, so landlords in Cooroy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oxenford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,273 against 4,801, roughly 2.6 times the size of Cooroy; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cooroy for a lower purchase price, Oxenford for recent price momentum, Cooroy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison