Skip to main content

Coorparoo vs Grange

Property investment comparison - Coorparoo, QLD 4151 vs Grange, QLD 4051

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coorparoo wins 4, Grange wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCoorparooGrange
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$860K$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.58%
Gross rental yield (units)3.85%2.42%
1-year house growth+13.9%estimate+11.6%
3-year house growth-+21.9%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.1%
Population18,1324,615

Coorparoo vs Grange: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Coorparoo and $1.9M in Grange, so Coorparoo is the cheaper entry point, with Grange houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Coorparoo sits at a median of $860K against $1.3M in Grange, which makes Coorparoo the more affordable unit market and Grange the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.9% in Coorparoo (an estimate) and +11.6% in Grange, so recent momentum favours Coorparoo, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Grange and 1.2% in Coorparoo, so landlords in Grange face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Coorparoo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,132 against 4,615, roughly 3.9 times the size of Grange; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Coorparoo for a lower purchase price, Coorparoo for recent price momentum, Grange for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison