Skip to main content

Coramba vs Kendall

Property investment comparison - Coramba, NSW 2450 vs Kendall, NSW 2439

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Coramba wins 2, Kendall wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCorambaKendall
Median house price$770K$770K
Median unit price$570K$490K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.62%
Gross rental yield (units)4.68%5.05%
1-year house growth+12.0%+9.2%
3-year house growth+17.0%+15.8%
Vacancy rate3.7%1.4%
Population8171,153

Coramba vs Kendall: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $770K in Coramba and $770K in Kendall.

For units, Coramba sits at a median of $570K against $490K in Kendall, which makes Kendall the more affordable unit market and Coramba the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Coramba and +9.2% in Kendall, so recent momentum favours Coramba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Coramba houses are +17.0% and Kendall houses +15.8%, so Coramba has compounded faster than Kendall over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Kendall and 3.7% in Coramba, so landlords in Kendall face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kendall is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,153 against 817, larger than Coramba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Coramba for recent price momentum, Kendall for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison