Skip to main content

Cordalba vs Meadowvale

Property investment comparison - Cordalba, QLD 4660 vs Meadowvale, QLD 4670

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cordalba wins 1, Meadowvale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCordalbaMeadowvale
Median house price$575K$575K
Median unit price$210K$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.71%5.83%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.80%
1-year house growth+13.3%-
3-year house growth+52.6%-
Vacancy rate3.7%1.0%
Population467434

Cordalba vs Meadowvale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $575K in Cordalba and $575K in Meadowvale.

For units, Cordalba sits at a median of $210K against $690K in Meadowvale, which makes Cordalba the more affordable unit market and Meadowvale the pricier one.

On cash flow, Meadowvale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.83%, compared with 4.71% in Cordalba, a gap of 1.12 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Meadowvale and 3.7% in Cordalba, so landlords in Meadowvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cordalba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 467 against 434, larger than Meadowvale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Meadowvale for rental income, Meadowvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Cordalba vs Meadowvale: Suburb Comparison 2026