Corio vs Earlston
Property investment comparison - Corio, VIC 3214 vs Earlston, VIC 3669
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Corio wins 0, Earlston wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Corio | Earlston |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $590K | $585K |
| Median unit price | $450K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.97% | 5.38% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.52% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +16.3% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +20.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 0.8% |
| Population | 15,497 | 82 |
Corio vs Earlston: what the numbers say
The median house price is $590K in Corio and $585K in Earlston, so Earlston is the cheaper entry point, with Corio houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Earlston leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.38%, compared with 3.97% in Corio, a gap of 1.41 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Earlston and 1.3% in Corio, so landlords in Earlston face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Corio is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,497 against 82, roughly 189 times the size of Earlston; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Earlston for rental income, Earlston for a lower purchase price, Earlston for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison