Skip to main content

Cornishtown vs Sassafras

Property investment comparison - Cornishtown, VIC 3683 vs Sassafras, VIC 3787

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cornishtown wins 2, Sassafras wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCornishtownSassafras
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$435K$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.31%3.89%
Gross rental yield (units)2.26%-
1-year house growth-+4.0%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.9%6.1%
Population94970

Cornishtown vs Sassafras: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Cornishtown and $1.0M in Sassafras, so Sassafras is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Cornishtown sits at a median of $435K against $1.1M in Sassafras, which makes Cornishtown the more affordable unit market and Sassafras the pricier one.

On cash flow, Sassafras leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.89%, compared with 2.31% in Cornishtown, a gap of 1.58 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Cornishtown and 6.1% in Sassafras, so landlords in Cornishtown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Sassafras is the bigger suburb, with a population of 970 against 94, roughly 10 times the size of Cornishtown; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sassafras for rental income, Sassafras for a lower purchase price, Cornishtown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison