Corunnun vs Derrimut
Property investment comparison - Corunnun, VIC 3249 vs Derrimut, VIC 3026
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Corunnun wins 0, Derrimut wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Corunnun | Derrimut |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $840K | $840K |
| Median unit price | - | $830K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.64% | 3.73% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.42% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +10.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +13.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Population | 119 | 8,651 |
Corunnun vs Derrimut: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in Corunnun and $840K in Derrimut.
On cash flow, Derrimut leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.73%, compared with 2.64% in Corunnun, a gap of 1.09 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.8%.
Derrimut is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,651 against 119, roughly 73 times the size of Corunnun; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Derrimut for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison