Corunnun vs Inverloch
Property investment comparison - Corunnun, VIC 3249 vs Inverloch, VIC 3996
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Corunnun wins 1, Inverloch wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Corunnun | Inverloch |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $840K | $840K |
| Median unit price | - | $590K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.64% | 3.28% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +1.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -12.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 1.7% |
| Population | 119 | 6,526 |
Corunnun vs Inverloch: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in Corunnun and $840K in Inverloch.
On cash flow, Inverloch leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.28%, compared with 2.64% in Corunnun, a gap of 0.64 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Corunnun and 1.7% in Inverloch, so landlords in Corunnun face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Inverloch is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,526 against 119, roughly 55 times the size of Corunnun; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Inverloch for rental income, Corunnun for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison