Cosgrove vs Eumemmerring
Property investment comparison - Cosgrove, VIC 3631 vs Eumemmerring, VIC 3177
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cosgrove wins 0, Eumemmerring wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cosgrove | Eumemmerring |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | $740K |
| Median unit price | - | $575K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.86% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.75% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 0.7% |
| Population | 50 | 2,285 |
Cosgrove vs Eumemmerring: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $740K in Cosgrove and $740K in Eumemmerring.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Eumemmerring and 1.4% in Cosgrove, so landlords in Eumemmerring face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Eumemmerring is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,285 against 50, roughly 46 times the size of Cosgrove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Eumemmerring for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison