Cosgrove vs Leneva
Property investment comparison - Cosgrove, VIC 3631 vs Leneva, VIC 3691
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cosgrove wins 1, Leneva wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cosgrove | Leneva |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | $740K |
| Median unit price | - | $555K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.50% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.96% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +12.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 4.6% |
| Population | 50 | 1,317 |
Cosgrove vs Leneva: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $740K in Cosgrove and $740K in Leneva.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Cosgrove and 4.6% in Leneva, so landlords in Cosgrove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Leneva is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,317 against 50, roughly 26 times the size of Cosgrove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Cosgrove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison