Cougal vs Montefiores
Property investment comparison - Cougal, NSW 2474 vs Montefiores, NSW 2820
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cougal wins 0, Montefiores wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cougal | Montefiores |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $545K | $540K |
| Median unit price | - | $710K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.94% | 5.07% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.27% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +23.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +38.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 10.3% | 2.0% |
| Population | 30 | 630 |
Cougal vs Montefiores: what the numbers say
The median house price is $545K in Cougal and $540K in Montefiores, so Montefiores is the cheaper entry point, with Cougal houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Montefiores leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.07%, compared with 3.94% in Cougal, a gap of 1.13 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Montefiores and 10.3% in Cougal, so landlords in Montefiores face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Montefiores is the bigger suburb, with a population of 630 against 30, roughly 21 times the size of Cougal; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Montefiores for rental income, Montefiores for a lower purchase price, Montefiores for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison