Skip to main content

Cradoc vs North Hobart

Property investment comparison - Cradoc, TAS 7109 vs North Hobart, TAS 7000

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cradoc wins 2, North Hobart wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCradocNorth Hobart
Median house price$940K$940K
Median unit price$455K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.45%
Gross rental yield (units)4.71%4.18%
1-year house growth+4.9%-1.3%
3-year house growth+5.5%+15.5%
Vacancy rate12.7%0.9%
Population4562,600

Cradoc vs North Hobart: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $940K in Cradoc and $940K in North Hobart.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.9% in Cradoc and -1.3% in North Hobart, so recent momentum favours Cradoc, while North Hobart went backwards.

Looking back three years, Cradoc houses are +5.5% and North Hobart houses +15.5%, so North Hobart has compounded faster than Cradoc over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in North Hobart and 12.7% in Cradoc, so landlords in North Hobart face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

North Hobart is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,600 against 456, roughly 6 times the size of Cradoc; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cradoc for recent price momentum, North Hobart for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison