Skip to main content

Crafers vs Lockleys

Property investment comparison - Crafers, SA 5152 vs Lockleys, SA 5032

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Crafers wins 2, Lockleys wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCrafersLockleys
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$635K$610K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.99%2.60%
Gross rental yield (units)3.13%-
1-year house growth+6.7%+10.8%estimate
3-year house growth+17.7%-
Vacancy rate2.4%0.7%
Population2,0065,987

Crafers vs Lockleys: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Crafers and $1.5M in Lockleys, so Crafers is the cheaper entry point, with Lockleys houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Crafers sits at a median of $635K against $610K in Lockleys, which makes Lockleys the more affordable unit market and Crafers the pricier one.

On cash flow, Crafers leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.99%, compared with 2.60% in Lockleys, a gap of 0.39 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.7% in Crafers and +10.8% in Lockleys (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Lockleys, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Lockleys and 2.4% in Crafers, so landlords in Lockleys face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lockleys is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,987 against 2,006, roughly 3.0 times the size of Crafers; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Crafers for rental income, Crafers for a lower purchase price, Lockleys for recent price momentum, Lockleys for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison