Skip to main content

Craigieburn vs Cranbourne

Property investment comparison - Craigieburn, VIC 3064 vs Cranbourne, VIC 3977

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Craigieburn wins 3, Cranbourne wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCraigieburnCranbourne
Median house price$720K$720K
Median unit price$480K$540K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.97%
Gross rental yield (units)5.04%4.81%
1-year house growth+5.2%+6.4%
3-year house growth+11.0%+9.9%
Vacancy rate2.3%1.9%
Population65,17821,281

Craigieburn vs Cranbourne: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $720K in Craigieburn and $720K in Cranbourne.

For units, Craigieburn sits at a median of $480K against $540K in Cranbourne, which makes Craigieburn the more affordable unit market and Cranbourne the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.2% in Craigieburn and +6.4% in Cranbourne, so recent momentum favours Cranbourne, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Craigieburn houses are +11.0% and Cranbourne houses +9.9%, so Craigieburn has compounded faster than Cranbourne over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Cranbourne and 2.3% in Craigieburn, so landlords in Cranbourne face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Craigieburn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 65,178 against 21,281, roughly 3.1 times the size of Cranbourne; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cranbourne for recent price momentum, Cranbourne for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison