Skip to main content

Craignish vs Peak Crossing

Property investment comparison - Craignish, QLD 4655 vs Peak Crossing, QLD 4306

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Craignish wins 4, Peak Crossing wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCraignishPeak Crossing
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$570K$750K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.62%2.93%
Gross rental yield (units)5.07%2.61%
1-year house growth+10.4%estimate-
3-year house growth-+72.5%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.0%
Population2,1901,016

Craignish vs Peak Crossing: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Craignish and $1.1M in Peak Crossing, so Craignish is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Craignish sits at a median of $570K against $750K in Peak Crossing, which makes Craignish the more affordable unit market and Peak Crossing the pricier one.

On cash flow, Craignish leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.62%, compared with 2.93% in Peak Crossing, a gap of 0.69 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Peak Crossing and 1.2% in Craignish, so landlords in Peak Crossing face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Craignish is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,190 against 1,016, roughly 2.2 times the size of Peak Crossing; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Craignish for rental income, Craignish for a lower purchase price, Peak Crossing for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison