Cranbourne West vs Ullina
Property investment comparison - Cranbourne West, VIC 3977 vs Ullina, VIC 3370
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cranbourne West wins 0, Ullina wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cranbourne West | Ullina |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $735K | $735K |
| Median unit price | $545K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.21% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +5.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +11.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.8% | 0.7% |
| Population | 19,969 | 25 |
Cranbourne West vs Ullina: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $735K in Cranbourne West and $735K in Ullina.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Ullina and 2.8% in Cranbourne West, so landlords in Ullina face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Cranbourne West is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,969 against 25, roughly 799 times the size of Ullina; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ullina for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Cranbourne West, VIC 3977
Open Cranbourne West suburb profileRecent sales in Cranbourne West
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison