Cranbrook vs Cremorne
Property investment comparison - Cranbrook, QLD 4814 vs Cremorne, QLD 4740
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cranbrook wins 1, Cremorne wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cranbrook | Cremorne |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $625K | $615K |
| Median unit price | $380K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.76% | 5.36% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.14% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +16.6% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +82.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 0.9% |
| Population | 5,844 | 19 |
Cranbrook vs Cremorne: what the numbers say
The median house price is $625K in Cranbrook and $615K in Cremorne, so Cremorne is the cheaper entry point, with Cranbrook houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Cremorne leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.36%, compared with 4.76% in Cranbrook, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Cranbrook and 0.9% in Cremorne, so landlords in Cranbrook face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Cranbrook is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,844 against 19, roughly 308 times the size of Cremorne; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Cremorne for rental income, Cremorne for a lower purchase price, Cranbrook for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison