Skip to main content

Cremorne Point vs Manly

Property investment comparison - Cremorne Point, NSW 2090 vs Manly, NSW 2095

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cremorne Point wins 2, Manly wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCremorne PointManly
Median house price$4.8M$5M
Median unit price$2.1M-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%2.11%
Gross rental yield (units)2.56%2.81%
1-year house growth+2.3%estimate+3.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.2%2.0%
Population2,27016,296

Cremorne Point vs Manly: what the numbers say

The median house price is $4.8M in Cremorne Point and $5M in Manly, so Cremorne Point is the cheaper entry point, with Manly houses about 4% dearer.

On cash flow, Cremorne Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.46%, compared with 2.11% in Manly, a gap of 0.35 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.3% in Cremorne Point (an estimate) and +3.1% in Manly (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Manly, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Manly and 2.2% in Cremorne Point, so landlords in Manly face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Manly is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,296 against 2,270, roughly 7 times the size of Cremorne Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cremorne Point for rental income, Cremorne Point for a lower purchase price, Manly for recent price momentum, Manly for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison