Cremorne vs Stanthorpe
Property investment comparison - Cremorne, QLD 4740 vs Stanthorpe, QLD 4380
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cremorne wins 1, Stanthorpe wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cremorne | Stanthorpe |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $615K | $615K |
| Median unit price | - | $490K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.36% | 4.26% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +17.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +46.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.5% |
| Population | 19 | 5,286 |
Cremorne vs Stanthorpe: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $615K in Cremorne and $615K in Stanthorpe.
On cash flow, Cremorne leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.36%, compared with 4.26% in Stanthorpe, a gap of 1.10 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Stanthorpe and 0.9% in Cremorne, so landlords in Stanthorpe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Stanthorpe is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,286 against 19, roughly 278 times the size of Cremorne; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Cremorne for rental income, Stanthorpe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison