Skip to main content

Creswick vs Delacombe

Property investment comparison - Creswick, VIC 3363 vs Delacombe, VIC 3356

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Creswick wins 0, Delacombe wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCreswickDelacombe
Median house price$600K$600K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.84%
Gross rental yield (units)5.88%-
1-year house growth+7.0%+13.8%
3-year house growth+9.5%+12.9%
Vacancy rate0.7%0.6%
Population3,2795,408

Creswick vs Delacombe: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $600K in Creswick and $600K in Delacombe.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.0% in Creswick and +13.8% in Delacombe, so recent momentum favours Delacombe, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Creswick houses are +9.5% and Delacombe houses +12.9%, so Delacombe has compounded faster than Creswick over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Delacombe and 0.7% in Creswick, so landlords in Delacombe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Delacombe is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,408 against 3,279, larger than Creswick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Delacombe for recent price momentum, Delacombe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison