Skip to main content

Cromer vs Sylvania Waters

Property investment comparison - Cromer, NSW 2099 vs Sylvania Waters, NSW 2224

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cromer wins 4, Sylvania Waters wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCromerSylvania Waters
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price$985K$1.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.70%
Gross rental yield (units)3.93%-
1-year house growth+4.9%-4.7%estimate
3-year house growth+6.8%-
Vacancy rate0.3%2.9%
Population8,0303,200

Cromer vs Sylvania Waters: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.5M in Cromer and $2.5M in Sylvania Waters, so Cromer is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Cromer sits at a median of $985K against $1.0M in Sylvania Waters, which makes Cromer the more affordable unit market and Sylvania Waters the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.9% in Cromer and -4.7% in Sylvania Waters (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Cromer, while Sylvania Waters went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Cromer and 2.9% in Sylvania Waters, so landlords in Cromer face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cromer is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,030 against 3,200, roughly 2.5 times the size of Sylvania Waters; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cromer for a lower purchase price, Cromer for recent price momentum, Cromer for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison