Skip to main content

Croom vs Kings Point

Property investment comparison - Croom, NSW 2527 vs Kings Point, NSW 2539

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Croom wins 3, Kings Point wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCroomKings Point
Median house price$865K$865K
Median unit price$725K$695K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.74%3.50%
Gross rental yield (units)5.61%3.88%
1-year house growth-+6.6%
3-year house growth-+6.2%
Vacancy rate0.6%2.2%
Population112609

Croom vs Kings Point: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $865K in Croom and $865K in Kings Point.

For units, Croom sits at a median of $725K against $695K in Kings Point, which makes Kings Point the more affordable unit market and Croom the pricier one.

On cash flow, Croom leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.74%, compared with 3.50% in Kings Point, a gap of 1.24 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Croom and 2.2% in Kings Point, so landlords in Croom face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kings Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 609 against 112, roughly 5 times the size of Croom; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Croom for rental income, Croom for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison