Skip to main content

Crossley vs Glenroy

Property investment comparison - Crossley, VIC 3283 vs Glenroy, VIC 3046

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Crossley wins 0, Glenroy wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCrossleyGlenroy
Median house price$870K$870K
Median unit price$705K$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.24%3.52%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.40%
1-year house growth-+5.6%
3-year house growth-+9.8%
Vacancy rate6.0%1.5%
Population23523,792

Crossley vs Glenroy: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $870K in Crossley and $870K in Glenroy.

For units, Crossley sits at a median of $705K against $630K in Glenroy, which makes Glenroy the more affordable unit market and Crossley the pricier one.

On cash flow, Glenroy leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.52%, compared with 2.24% in Crossley, a gap of 1.28 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Glenroy and 6.0% in Crossley, so landlords in Glenroy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Glenroy is the bigger suburb, with a population of 23,792 against 235, roughly 101 times the size of Crossley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Glenroy for rental income, Glenroy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison