Skip to main content

Croudace Bay vs Heckenberg

Property investment comparison - Croudace Bay, NSW 2280 vs Heckenberg, NSW 2168

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Croudace Bay wins 1, Heckenberg wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCroudace BayHeckenberg
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$795K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)2.44%4.52%
1-year house growth+4.9%estimate+8.7%
3-year house growth-+29.9%
Vacancy rate2.6%2.2%
Population6413,263

Croudace Bay vs Heckenberg: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Croudace Bay and $1.1M in Heckenberg, so Heckenberg is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Croudace Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.30%, compared with 3.20% in Heckenberg, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.9% in Croudace Bay (an estimate) and +8.7% in Heckenberg, so recent momentum favours Heckenberg, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Heckenberg and 2.6% in Croudace Bay, so landlords in Heckenberg face less competition for tenants.

Heckenberg is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,263 against 641, roughly 5 times the size of Croudace Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Croudace Bay for rental income, Heckenberg for a lower purchase price, Heckenberg for recent price momentum, Heckenberg for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison