Crowlands vs Kings Park
Property investment comparison - Crowlands, VIC 3377 vs Kings Park, VIC 3021
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Crowlands wins 0, Kings Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Crowlands | Kings Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $675K | $670K |
| Median unit price | $220K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.40% | 3.88% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.57% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +6.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +11.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.0% |
| Population | 72 | 8,203 |
Crowlands vs Kings Park: what the numbers say
The median house price is $675K in Crowlands and $670K in Kings Park, so Kings Park is the cheaper entry point, with Crowlands houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Kings Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.88%, compared with 3.40% in Crowlands, a gap of 0.48 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Kings Park and 1.5% in Crowlands, so landlords in Kings Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Kings Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,203 against 72, roughly 114 times the size of Crowlands; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kings Park for rental income, Kings Park for a lower purchase price, Kings Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison