Croxton East vs Kurunjang
Property investment comparison - Croxton East, VIC 3301 vs Kurunjang, VIC 3337
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Croxton East wins 1, Kurunjang wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Croxton East | Kurunjang |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $615K | $620K |
| Median unit price | - | $450K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.42% | 3.64% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.80% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +12.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +18.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 14.2% | 2.4% |
| Population | 70 | 10,711 |
Croxton East vs Kurunjang: what the numbers say
The median house price is $615K in Croxton East and $620K in Kurunjang, so Croxton East is the cheaper entry point, with Kurunjang houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Kurunjang leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.64%, compared with 3.42% in Croxton East, a gap of 0.22 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Kurunjang and 14.2% in Croxton East, so landlords in Kurunjang face less competition for tenants.
Kurunjang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,711 against 70, roughly 153 times the size of Croxton East; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kurunjang for rental income, Croxton East for a lower purchase price, Kurunjang for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison