Croxton East vs Wallan
Property investment comparison - Croxton East, VIC 3301 vs Wallan, VIC 3756
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Croxton East wins 1, Wallan wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Croxton East | Wallan |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $615K | $620K |
| Median unit price | - | $465K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.42% | 4.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.77% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +0.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -0.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 14.2% | 2.1% |
| Population | 70 | 15,004 |
Croxton East vs Wallan: what the numbers say
The median house price is $615K in Croxton East and $620K in Wallan, so Croxton East is the cheaper entry point, with Wallan houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Wallan leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.00%, compared with 3.42% in Croxton East, a gap of 0.58 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Wallan and 14.2% in Croxton East, so landlords in Wallan face less competition for tenants.
Wallan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,004 against 70, roughly 214 times the size of Croxton East; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wallan for rental income, Croxton East for a lower purchase price, Wallan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison