Croydon North vs Dixie
Property investment comparison - Croydon North, VIC 3136 vs Dixie, VIC 3265
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Croydon North wins 2, Dixie wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Croydon North | Dixie |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $715K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.57% | 2.05% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.50% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +0.8%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 4.0% |
| Population | 8,092 | 148 |
Croydon North vs Dixie: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Croydon North and $1.1M in Dixie.
On cash flow, Croydon North leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.57%, compared with 2.05% in Dixie, a gap of 1.52 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Croydon North and 4.0% in Dixie, so landlords in Croydon North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Croydon North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,092 against 148, roughly 55 times the size of Dixie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Croydon North for rental income, Croydon North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison