Skip to main content

Cudgen vs Davistown

Property investment comparison - Cudgen, NSW 2487 vs Davistown, NSW 2251

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cudgen wins 2, Davistown wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCudgenDavistown
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.92%2.99%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.84%
1-year house growth+7.2%estimate+5.3%
3-year house growth-+29.7%
Vacancy rate3.4%0.4%
Population9522,602

Cudgen vs Davistown: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Cudgen and $1.3M in Davistown.

On cash flow, Cudgen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.92%, compared with 2.99% in Davistown, a gap of 1.93 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.2% in Cudgen (an estimate) and +5.3% in Davistown, so recent momentum favours Cudgen, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Davistown and 3.4% in Cudgen, so landlords in Davistown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Davistown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,602 against 952, roughly 2.7 times the size of Cudgen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cudgen for rental income, Cudgen for recent price momentum, Davistown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison