Skip to main content

Culburra Beach vs Currans Hill

Property investment comparison - Culburra Beach, NSW 2540 vs Currans Hill, NSW 2567

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Culburra Beach wins 0, Currans Hill wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCulburra BeachCurrans Hill
Median house price$1.1M$1.0M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)2.88%-
Gross rental yield (units)-3.91%
1-year house growth+4.0%+8.2%
3-year house growth+12.1%+19.6%
Vacancy rate1.7%1.6%
Population2,9465,541

Culburra Beach vs Currans Hill: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Culburra Beach and $1.0M in Currans Hill, so Currans Hill is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.0% in Culburra Beach and +8.2% in Currans Hill, so recent momentum favours Currans Hill, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Culburra Beach houses are +12.1% and Currans Hill houses +19.6%, so Currans Hill has compounded faster than Culburra Beach over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Currans Hill and 1.7% in Culburra Beach, so landlords in Currans Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Currans Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,541 against 2,946, larger than Culburra Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Currans Hill for a lower purchase price, Currans Hill for recent price momentum, Currans Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison