Skip to main content

Culburra Beach vs Windsor

Property investment comparison - Culburra Beach, NSW 2540 vs Windsor, NSW 2756

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Culburra Beach wins 1, Windsor wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCulburra BeachWindsor
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$535K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.88%3.51%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+4.0%+8.2%
3-year house growth+12.1%+27.9%
Vacancy rate1.7%2.0%
Population2,9461,915

Culburra Beach vs Windsor: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Culburra Beach and $1.1M in Windsor.

On cash flow, Windsor leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.51%, compared with 2.88% in Culburra Beach, a gap of 0.63 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.0% in Culburra Beach and +8.2% in Windsor, so recent momentum favours Windsor, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Culburra Beach houses are +12.1% and Windsor houses +27.9%, so Windsor has compounded faster than Culburra Beach over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Culburra Beach and 2.0% in Windsor, so landlords in Culburra Beach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Culburra Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,946 against 1,915, larger than Windsor; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Windsor for rental income, Windsor for recent price momentum, Culburra Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison