Cullen vs Rushworth
Property investment comparison - Cullen, VIC 3568 vs Rushworth, VIC 3612
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cullen wins 0, Rushworth wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Cullen | Rushworth |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $390K | $370K |
| Median unit price | - | $310K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 5.33% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.09% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -8.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.8% | 1.8% |
| Population | 36 | 1,411 |
Cullen vs Rushworth: what the numbers say
The median house price is $390K in Cullen and $370K in Rushworth, so Rushworth is the cheaper entry point, with Cullen houses about 5% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Rushworth and 2.8% in Cullen, so landlords in Rushworth face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Rushworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,411 against 36, roughly 39 times the size of Cullen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Rushworth for a lower purchase price, Rushworth for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison