Skip to main content

Cundletown vs Oxley Vale

Property investment comparison - Cundletown, NSW 2430 vs Oxley Vale, NSW 2340

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cundletown wins 2, Oxley Vale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCundletownOxley Vale
Median house price$620K$620K
Median unit price$400K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.53%4.60%
Gross rental yield (units)5.10%4.65%
1-year house growth+7.7%estimate+17.8%
3-year house growth-+31.2%
Vacancy rate0.8%2.8%
Population2,0503,935

Cundletown vs Oxley Vale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $620K in Cundletown and $620K in Oxley Vale.

On cash flow, Oxley Vale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.60%, compared with 4.53% in Cundletown, a gap of 0.07 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.7% in Cundletown (an estimate) and +17.8% in Oxley Vale, so recent momentum favours Oxley Vale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Cundletown and 2.8% in Oxley Vale, so landlords in Cundletown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oxley Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,935 against 2,050, larger than Cundletown; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oxley Vale for rental income, Oxley Vale for recent price momentum, Cundletown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison