Skip to main content

Cundletown vs Rowan

Property investment comparison - Cundletown, NSW 2430 vs Rowan, NSW 2650

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Cundletown wins 1, Rowan wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCundletownRowan
Median house price$620K$620K
Median unit price$400K$385K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.53%4.58%
Gross rental yield (units)5.10%5.61%
1-year house growth+7.7%estimate+23.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%1.0%
Population2,050105

Cundletown vs Rowan: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $620K in Cundletown and $620K in Rowan.

For units, Cundletown sits at a median of $400K against $385K in Rowan, which makes Rowan the more affordable unit market and Cundletown the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.53% in Cundletown and 4.58% in Rowan, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.7% in Cundletown (an estimate) and +23.4% in Rowan (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Rowan, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Cundletown and 1.0% in Rowan, so landlords in Cundletown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Cundletown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,050 against 105, roughly 20 times the size of Rowan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rowan for recent price momentum, Cundletown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison