Curdievale vs St Albans Park
Property investment comparison - Curdievale, VIC 3268 vs St Albans Park, VIC 3219
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Curdievale wins 1, St Albans Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Curdievale | St Albans Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $695K | $700K |
| Median unit price | - | $490K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.89% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.20% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +13.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +19.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.7% | 0.9% |
| Population | 125 | 4,942 |
Curdievale vs St Albans Park: what the numbers say
The median house price is $695K in Curdievale and $700K in St Albans Park, so Curdievale is the cheaper entry point, with St Albans Park houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in St Albans Park and 2.7% in Curdievale, so landlords in St Albans Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
St Albans Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,942 against 125, roughly 40 times the size of Curdievale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Curdievale for a lower purchase price, St Albans Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
St Albans Park, VIC 3219
Open St Albans Park suburb profileRecent sales in St Albans Park
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison