Skip to main content

Curl Curl vs Lindfield

Property investment comparison - Curl Curl, NSW 2096 vs Lindfield, NSW 2070

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Curl Curl wins 3, Lindfield wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCurl CurlLindfield
Median house price$4.2M$4.2M
Median unit price$1.8M$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.07%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.20%-
1-year house growth+4.2%estimate+2.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%2.8%
Population2,36410,943

Curl Curl vs Lindfield: what the numbers say

The median house price is $4.2M in Curl Curl and $4.2M in Lindfield, so Curl Curl is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Curl Curl sits at a median of $1.8M against $1.3M in Lindfield, which makes Lindfield the more affordable unit market and Curl Curl the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.2% in Curl Curl (an estimate) and +2.1% in Lindfield (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Curl Curl, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Curl Curl and 2.8% in Lindfield, so landlords in Curl Curl face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lindfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,943 against 2,364, roughly 4.6 times the size of Curl Curl; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Curl Curl for a lower purchase price, Curl Curl for recent price momentum, Curl Curl for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison