Skip to main content

Curlewis vs Pakenham

Property investment comparison - Curlewis, VIC 3222 vs Pakenham, VIC 3810

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Curlewis wins 2, Pakenham wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCurlewisPakenham
Median house price$720K$720K
Median unit price$730K$560K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.03%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.09%4.73%
1-year house growth+8.0%+7.6%
3-year house growth+6.0%+12.5%
Vacancy rate1.6%1.7%
Population4,17554,118

Curlewis vs Pakenham: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $720K in Curlewis and $720K in Pakenham.

For units, Curlewis sits at a median of $730K against $560K in Pakenham, which makes Pakenham the more affordable unit market and Curlewis the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in Curlewis and +7.6% in Pakenham, so recent momentum favours Curlewis, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Curlewis houses are +6.0% and Pakenham houses +12.5%, so Pakenham has compounded faster than Curlewis over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Curlewis and 1.7% in Pakenham, so landlords in Curlewis face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Pakenham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 54,118 against 4,175, roughly 13 times the size of Curlewis; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Curlewis for recent price momentum, Curlewis for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison