Skip to main content

Currambine vs Hazelmere

Property investment comparison - Currambine, WA 6028 vs Hazelmere, WA 6055

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Currambine wins 3, Hazelmere wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCurrambineHazelmere
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$660K$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.96%
1-year house growth+19.1%-
3-year house growth+57.3%-
Vacancy rate-0.0%0.7%
Population6,834935

Currambine vs Hazelmere: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Currambine and $1.1M in Hazelmere, so Currambine is the cheaper entry point, with Hazelmere houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Currambine sits at a median of $660K against $630K in Hazelmere, which makes Hazelmere the more affordable unit market and Currambine the pricier one.

On cash flow, Currambine leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.20%, compared with 3.90% in Hazelmere, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is -0.0% in Currambine and 0.7% in Hazelmere, so landlords in Currambine face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Currambine is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,834 against 935, roughly 7 times the size of Hazelmere; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Currambine for rental income, Currambine for a lower purchase price, Currambine for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison