Skip to main content

Curramore vs Darling Heights

Property investment comparison - Curramore, QLD 4552 vs Darling Heights, QLD 4350

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Curramore wins 0, Darling Heights wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCurramoreDarling Heights
Median house price$790K$790K
Median unit price$300K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%3.77%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.24%
1-year house growth-+21.9%
3-year house growth-+56.0%
Vacancy rate1.3%0.4%
Population1985,157

Curramore vs Darling Heights: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $790K in Curramore and $790K in Darling Heights.

On cash flow, Darling Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.77%, compared with 3.60% in Curramore, a gap of 0.17 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Darling Heights and 1.3% in Curramore, so landlords in Darling Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Darling Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,157 against 198, roughly 26 times the size of Curramore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Darling Heights for rental income, Darling Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison