Skip to main content

Curramore vs Tivoli

Property investment comparison - Curramore, QLD 4552 vs Tivoli, QLD 4305

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Curramore wins 1, Tivoli wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCurramoreTivoli
Median house price$790K$790K
Median unit price$300K$710K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%3.91%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.02%
1-year house growth-+19.3%
3-year house growth-+76.2%
Vacancy rate1.3%0.8%
Population1981,460

Curramore vs Tivoli: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $790K in Curramore and $790K in Tivoli.

For units, Curramore sits at a median of $300K against $710K in Tivoli, which makes Curramore the more affordable unit market and Tivoli the pricier one.

On cash flow, Tivoli leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.91%, compared with 3.60% in Curramore, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Tivoli and 1.3% in Curramore, so landlords in Tivoli face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tivoli is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,460 against 198, roughly 7 times the size of Curramore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tivoli for rental income, Tivoli for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Curramore vs Tivoli: Property Investment Comparison (2026)