Curramore vs Yungaburra
Property investment comparison - Curramore, QLD 4552 vs Yungaburra, QLD 4884
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Curramore wins 2, Yungaburra wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Curramore | Yungaburra |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $790K | $795K |
| Median unit price | $300K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.60% | 3.80% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.00% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +13.5% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +31.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 2.0% |
| Population | 198 | 1,272 |
Curramore vs Yungaburra: what the numbers say
The median house price is $790K in Curramore and $795K in Yungaburra, so Curramore is the cheaper entry point, with Yungaburra houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Yungaburra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 3.60% in Curramore, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Curramore and 2.0% in Yungaburra, so landlords in Curramore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Yungaburra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,272 against 198, roughly 6 times the size of Curramore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Yungaburra for rental income, Curramore for a lower purchase price, Curramore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison