Skip to main content

Currans Hill vs Hallsville

Property investment comparison - Currans Hill, NSW 2567 vs Hallsville, NSW 2340

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Currans Hill wins 1, Hallsville wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCurrans HillHallsville
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price-$370K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.83%
Gross rental yield (units)3.91%6.94%
1-year house growth+8.2%+14.9%
3-year house growth+19.6%+33.2%
Vacancy rate1.6%2.0%
Population5,541642

Currans Hill vs Hallsville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Currans Hill and $1.0M in Hallsville.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.2% in Currans Hill and +14.9% in Hallsville, so recent momentum favours Hallsville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Currans Hill houses are +19.6% and Hallsville houses +33.2%, so Hallsville has compounded faster than Currans Hill over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Currans Hill and 2.0% in Hallsville, so landlords in Currans Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Currans Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,541 against 642, roughly 9 times the size of Hallsville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hallsville for recent price momentum, Currans Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison