Currans Hill vs Nelson Bay
Property investment comparison - Currans Hill, NSW 2567 vs Nelson Bay, NSW 2315
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Currans Hill wins 1, Nelson Bay wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Currans Hill | Nelson Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Median unit price | - | $700K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.48% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.91% | 4.31% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.2% | +0.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +19.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| Population | 5,541 | 6,141 |
Currans Hill vs Nelson Bay: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Currans Hill and $1.0M in Nelson Bay.
Over the past year house prices moved +8.2% in Currans Hill and +0.1% in Nelson Bay (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Currans Hill, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.6%.
Nelson Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,141 against 5,541, larger than Currans Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Currans Hill for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison