Skip to main content

Currimundi vs Shailer Park

Property investment comparison - Currimundi, QLD 4551 vs Shailer Park, QLD 4128

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Currimundi wins 3, Shailer Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCurrimundiShailer Park
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$670K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.44%3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)4.20%4.03%
1-year house growth+18.2%+15.8%estimate
3-year house growth+40.7%-
Vacancy rate1.5%1.0%
Population6,57012,182

Currimundi vs Shailer Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Currimundi and $1.2M in Shailer Park.

On cash flow, Currimundi leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.44%, compared with 3.20% in Shailer Park, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.2% in Currimundi and +15.8% in Shailer Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Currimundi, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Shailer Park and 1.5% in Currimundi, so landlords in Shailer Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Shailer Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,182 against 6,570, larger than Currimundi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Currimundi for rental income, Currimundi for recent price momentum, Shailer Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison