Skip to main content

Currumbin vs Twin Waters

Property investment comparison - Currumbin, QLD 4223 vs Twin Waters, QLD 4564

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Currumbin wins 3, Twin Waters wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricCurrumbinTwin Waters
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$1.1M$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)4.05%3.60%
1-year house growth+8.8%estimate+13.7%
3-year house growth-+27.2%
Vacancy rate2.5%0.6%
Population3,2782,966

Currumbin vs Twin Waters: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.9M in Currumbin and $1.9M in Twin Waters, so Currumbin is the cheaper entry point, with Twin Waters houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Currumbin sits at a median of $1.1M against $1.3M in Twin Waters, which makes Currumbin the more affordable unit market and Twin Waters the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.8% in Currumbin (an estimate) and +13.7% in Twin Waters, so recent momentum favours Twin Waters, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Twin Waters and 2.5% in Currumbin, so landlords in Twin Waters face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Currumbin is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,278 against 2,966, larger than Twin Waters; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Currumbin for a lower purchase price, Twin Waters for recent price momentum, Twin Waters for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison