Daglish vs Parklands
Property investment comparison - Daglish, WA 6008 vs Parklands, WA 6180
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Daglish wins 0, Parklands wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Daglish | Parklands |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.0M | $2.0M |
| Median unit price | $560K | $235K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.43% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.39% | 5.49% |
| 1-year house growth | +22.3%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 4.3% | 1.8% |
| Population | 1,551 | 603 |
Daglish vs Parklands: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.0M in Daglish and $2.0M in Parklands, so Parklands is the cheaper entry point.
For units, Daglish sits at a median of $560K against $235K in Parklands, which makes Parklands the more affordable unit market and Daglish the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Parklands and 4.3% in Daglish, so landlords in Parklands face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Daglish is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,551 against 603, roughly 2.6 times the size of Parklands; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Parklands for a lower purchase price, Parklands for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison