Skip to main content

Dalmore vs Ringwood North

Property investment comparison - Dalmore, VIC 3981 vs Ringwood North, VIC 3134

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dalmore wins 2, Ringwood North wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDalmoreRingwood North
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$565K$910K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.87%2.88%
Gross rental yield (units)3.36%2.75%
1-year house growth-+3.2%
3-year house growth-+3.9%
Vacancy rate4.9%1.6%
Population1429,964

Dalmore vs Ringwood North: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Dalmore and $1.3M in Ringwood North, so Ringwood North is the cheaper entry point, with Dalmore houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Dalmore sits at a median of $565K against $910K in Ringwood North, which makes Dalmore the more affordable unit market and Ringwood North the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.87% in Dalmore and 2.88% in Ringwood North, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Ringwood North and 4.9% in Dalmore, so landlords in Ringwood North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ringwood North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,964 against 142, roughly 70 times the size of Dalmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ringwood North for a lower purchase price, Ringwood North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison