Skip to main content

Dalmore vs Warranwood

Property investment comparison - Dalmore, VIC 3981 vs Warranwood, VIC 3134

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Dalmore wins 2, Warranwood wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricDalmoreWarranwood
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$565K$820K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.87%3.19%
Gross rental yield (units)3.36%3.89%
1-year house growth--2.9%
3-year house growth-+2.6%
Vacancy rate4.9%1.8%
Population1424,820

Dalmore vs Warranwood: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Dalmore and $1.3M in Warranwood, so Dalmore is the cheaper entry point, with Warranwood houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Dalmore sits at a median of $565K against $820K in Warranwood, which makes Dalmore the more affordable unit market and Warranwood the pricier one.

On cash flow, Warranwood leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.19%, compared with 2.87% in Dalmore, a gap of 0.32 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Warranwood and 4.9% in Dalmore, so landlords in Warranwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Warranwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,820 against 142, roughly 34 times the size of Dalmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Warranwood for rental income, Dalmore for a lower purchase price, Warranwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison